AFCA Ready

Operational readiness for Australia’s financial complaints framework.

Purpose

AFCA Ready helps financial firms and consumers identify and correct procedural, governance, and fairness risks before they escalate into binding outcomes or reputational damage.

AFCA outcomes are shaped by fact patterns, conduct, and procedural fairness. Most adverse outcomes arise from process failure, weak reassessment practice, or poor evidence discipline — not from a lack of “arguments”.
Important: AFCA Ready does not provide rule summaries, templates, or instructions. Our work focuses on how matters are handled in practice — timing, ownership of decisions, evidence handling, and fairness alignment — not how rules read in isolation.

One-line moat: AFCA Ready focuses on how matters unfold in reality — not how rules read in theory.

Process integrity Evidence discipline Fairness alignment Non-representative

What We Do

AFCA Readiness Diagnostics

We identify procedural and fairness exposure by reviewing how a matter has been handled over time — including complaint progression, reassessment conduct, evidence discipline, and decision accountability.

Process Alignment Review

We examine whether handling practices align with AFCA’s fairness-based expectations in practice, including whether issues were properly reconsidered, explained, and owned at each stage.

Engagement Support (Non-Representative)

We assist with organisation and clarity of materials during AFCA engagement. We do not provide submissions, arguments, or advocacy.

Deliverables

AFCA Readiness Snapshot

A fixed-scope diagnostic intended to surface handling risks early. Deliverables are based on the specific materials reviewed and the way the matter has been handled to date. Findings are not generalised and cannot be generated through automated analysis.

Scope boundary: This is diagnostic and process-support work only. It is not legal advice, representation, or claims management.

FAQ

Can’t someone just paste this into an AI tool?

Anyone can copy information. The value of AFCA readiness is not information — it is judgement about how the record reads in practice across time, what is missing, and where process integrity breaks down under scrutiny. Automated tools do not reliably assess procedural fairness in messy, real-world files.

Do you tell people what to say to AFCA?

No. AFCA Ready does not provide submissions, arguments, or advocacy. We support evidence discipline, organisation, and clarity of materials — and identify process exposure points so decisions and reassessments can be owned and defensible.

Who is this for?

Resources